The Wisdom of Love
"A loving heart is the truest wisdom" - Charles Dickens
Thursday, April 4, 2013
Making the Invisible, Visible
For the past couple of weeks we have been studying about Human Rights. The first week was an intro to Human Rights, what they are, and why it's important. We shifted around some work centers. We then identified some topics and went through a process called consensus building, in the goal of coming to a conclusion of a topic we would be focusing deeply on for the next few weeks. Our class landed on the topic of HIV, and more particularly the discrimination that goes along with it. In the beginning, I knew only a few basic facts about HIV/AIDS. I really didn't understand why people with HIV would carry around a stigma, why others would discriminate them, and why it's so embarrassing to have it - after all, it's a disease, and anyone can catch diseases. During the research, I found out a lot more about HIV - how it can be passed on, how it affects people, why there's discrimination, who it affects, what's being done to improve it, and what should be done. The number of people that's been affected and that are still suffering from this disease is humongous in Malaysia and many other countries, and most of these people are uneducated about the disease that they carry around in their bodies. It's a disease that not a lot of people talk about, and therefore not a lot of people know about it. I'm a lot more lucky in terms of education, and yet I hardly know much about this - then what about the people who can't afford education? HIV/AIDS is a widely spread epidemic and is still spreading rapidly. It's growing more and more dangerous as more people are infected, and that's why it's such an important topic to focus on. Since it's a disease that is embarrassing to talk about, what people need to know about this deadly disease doesn't get to them, making the epidemic spread so rapidly, but invisibly. The disease could be living in a person's body for 10 - 15 years with no symptoms before he or she realizes that they are infected - shocking. During that time, the person could spread the disease to tens of people, without even knowing it. This makes the disease very, very dangerous, and to solve this problem and educate people about it isn't easy. People don't seem to accept the information they are given, and they don't want to believe it nor talk about it, making the job harder. But there is a way, though it might be the longer, tougher, and slower way, but it will help, and that is what we are working towards to achieve in this topic - to educate and raise awareness, if only a few people, about this deadly epidemic.
Saturday, March 9, 2013
Dealing with a Dictator
Many dictators have been and are still roaming around all over the world, even til today. Those of you who are more into politics might have an idea of who they are, but for those you who don't, here are a few examples:
Adolf Hitler: Dictator of Germany during the Third Reich. His ultimate hatred for the Jews fueled him to set up concentration camps and death camps where about 2,700,000 Jews were rounded in and treated beyond slaves, tortured, and murdered either by shooting, asphyxiation, or gas poisoning in gas chambers.
Vladimir Putin: Dictator of Russia today. He rose to power in 1999 as the country's President, then Prime Minister, then back to President again now. Putin has gained control over the authorities in the country, intentionally putting his allies in power. He has made up laws that do not allow citizens to protest or be part of a demonstration, or else they pay for it - grievously.
Kim Jong Un: Present dictator of the secretive North Korea. He only came into power about a year ago, after his father's death. Disabled people are kicked out of the city, news and messages that go in and out are censored and propaganda. Kim Jong Un also focuses on the military of his country; lately, he's been building nuclear weapons and testing them.
These are three examples, but there are many more. As you can see, these people are very dangerous, cruel, and power-hungry. You shouldn't leave a dictator as he is, because he's likely going to cause more damage to the country and maybe even some other countries. But how do we deal with a dictator? Confronting wouldn't be really smart, because you'd probably be dead in a few seconds following your first word, unless you really feel confident and brave enough to be successful, in which case I wouldn't really consider the leader as a dictator, or it's just the confronter is not very smart(probably the latter). During the past month or so, we've been studying about one Shakespeare's great works: the play of Julius Caesar. So we could do what the conspirators did - assassinate the dictator. But of course in the play it didn't end up so well; the country dissolved into civil war and complete chaos. And it's pretty likely that something like that could happen now, if we did deal with a dictator that way. For example, the dictator's allies (people in power) or just simply people who actually loved the dictator would probably seek revenge. When two groups of a country are raging with fire and have completely different opinions on something, civil war is what is a lot of the time destined to be in that country. So, we might have to come up with a more efficient way of taking care of someone who's gone a bit over the line. Well, the people from inside the country could decide to take matters into their own hands and figure out something, like gathering a group of people large enough to stand a chance of succeeding. That could be a first step. They could have protests/demonstrations and riots, in an attempt to present their statement to the public, if not to actually take down the dictator, which is probably impossible to do with just a few protests and demonstrations. Or they could try to get someone in power or authority to be on their side, so physically they have an advantage. The person could be someone who can get close to the dictator often without being suspected, or it could be someone from the army, which would result in a military coup. If, by any chance, they get the entire population of the country on their side, then there's not much work to do, because the dictator, no matter how powerful and mighty he is, can't afford to kill the whole country because well then, who's left there to bow down to him?
On the other hand, there's a second group of people who could help out the poor country - other countries! Okay, they could be impatient and march an army into the country and start war, but this time it's going to be worse than civil war, so no, it's not a good idea. Here's one that might work. By boycotting the country, they could force the dictator to step down, at least a little bit. Some ways of boycotting would be to limit the country's resources by refusing to trade certain goods with them, especially the ones that allow them to build and make dangerous items, like weaponry. The shortage of resources that cannot be found in the country and needs to be imported from abroad can really suffer the country and make the dictator step down by default.
In conclusion, whichever the way chosen, a plan has to be well laid out, another reason why having a person who has physical power or who can get close to the dictator is so important, because then they know what might work and what would not. That way certain strategies could be eliminated. Besides that, there has to expert communication in the group, or else the plan's likely to fail. None of the ways are easy, but this was an issue that has been in the world as long as history dates back, and sadly, it's still an issue the world faces even today.
Adolf Hitler: Dictator of Germany during the Third Reich. His ultimate hatred for the Jews fueled him to set up concentration camps and death camps where about 2,700,000 Jews were rounded in and treated beyond slaves, tortured, and murdered either by shooting, asphyxiation, or gas poisoning in gas chambers.
Vladimir Putin: Dictator of Russia today. He rose to power in 1999 as the country's President, then Prime Minister, then back to President again now. Putin has gained control over the authorities in the country, intentionally putting his allies in power. He has made up laws that do not allow citizens to protest or be part of a demonstration, or else they pay for it - grievously.
Kim Jong Un: Present dictator of the secretive North Korea. He only came into power about a year ago, after his father's death. Disabled people are kicked out of the city, news and messages that go in and out are censored and propaganda. Kim Jong Un also focuses on the military of his country; lately, he's been building nuclear weapons and testing them.
These are three examples, but there are many more. As you can see, these people are very dangerous, cruel, and power-hungry. You shouldn't leave a dictator as he is, because he's likely going to cause more damage to the country and maybe even some other countries. But how do we deal with a dictator? Confronting wouldn't be really smart, because you'd probably be dead in a few seconds following your first word, unless you really feel confident and brave enough to be successful, in which case I wouldn't really consider the leader as a dictator, or it's just the confronter is not very smart(probably the latter). During the past month or so, we've been studying about one Shakespeare's great works: the play of Julius Caesar. So we could do what the conspirators did - assassinate the dictator. But of course in the play it didn't end up so well; the country dissolved into civil war and complete chaos. And it's pretty likely that something like that could happen now, if we did deal with a dictator that way. For example, the dictator's allies (people in power) or just simply people who actually loved the dictator would probably seek revenge. When two groups of a country are raging with fire and have completely different opinions on something, civil war is what is a lot of the time destined to be in that country. So, we might have to come up with a more efficient way of taking care of someone who's gone a bit over the line. Well, the people from inside the country could decide to take matters into their own hands and figure out something, like gathering a group of people large enough to stand a chance of succeeding. That could be a first step. They could have protests/demonstrations and riots, in an attempt to present their statement to the public, if not to actually take down the dictator, which is probably impossible to do with just a few protests and demonstrations. Or they could try to get someone in power or authority to be on their side, so physically they have an advantage. The person could be someone who can get close to the dictator often without being suspected, or it could be someone from the army, which would result in a military coup. If, by any chance, they get the entire population of the country on their side, then there's not much work to do, because the dictator, no matter how powerful and mighty he is, can't afford to kill the whole country because well then, who's left there to bow down to him?
On the other hand, there's a second group of people who could help out the poor country - other countries! Okay, they could be impatient and march an army into the country and start war, but this time it's going to be worse than civil war, so no, it's not a good idea. Here's one that might work. By boycotting the country, they could force the dictator to step down, at least a little bit. Some ways of boycotting would be to limit the country's resources by refusing to trade certain goods with them, especially the ones that allow them to build and make dangerous items, like weaponry. The shortage of resources that cannot be found in the country and needs to be imported from abroad can really suffer the country and make the dictator step down by default.
In conclusion, whichever the way chosen, a plan has to be well laid out, another reason why having a person who has physical power or who can get close to the dictator is so important, because then they know what might work and what would not. That way certain strategies could be eliminated. Besides that, there has to expert communication in the group, or else the plan's likely to fail. None of the ways are easy, but this was an issue that has been in the world as long as history dates back, and sadly, it's still an issue the world faces even today.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Assassination: Caesar and Mountbatten
Lord Louis Mountbatten (1900 - 1979) |
During the past few days in humanities, we have been studying about Julius Caesar's assassination. Today, we widened our study and looked at some other people who have been assassinated in the past century. We got into groups, each group assigned a person to focus on. My group and I were given Lord Louis Mountbatten to research about. Mountbatten was a member of the Royal British Family, as well as a commander in the Navy. This made him quite powerful and skilled, and the same goes to Julius Caesar - he was the Consul for many years, and was later worshipped by the people of Rome. His skills on the battlefield also made him stand out, which contributed to how much power he had. Both were leaders - powerful, skilled, important people. And both were assassinated. You can see this pattern occur in many assassinations as well. The reason why people get assassinated is often because they pose some kind of threat to a group of people, often the killer(s), but not necessarily. Caesar was getting too powerful and was on his way to dictatorship, and then the Senate that the Romans were so proud of would not exist anymore, and that was why Caesar was assassinated. Mountbatten was a powerful and influential man, and therefore he was an important target to their cause. All assassinations are for a purpose, and almost always there's a benefit the comes with it. Some assassinations might just be a revenge on the victim, but most actually benefit the group of people that's being threatened by the person/victim. Another reason why people are assassinated is to draw attention toward the assassin. For example, the IRA decided to kill Lord Louis Mountbatten was partly also to draw attention towards there cause in wanting to become a separate country.
Whether assassinations are justified are not, it depends on its purpose. Like I said before, some assassinations are just for the sake of revenging and getting equal on the victim. However, if the assassination was for the general good of the people, then there is a way that it can be justified. If killing one person would save a large number of people, or prevent something extremely bad from happening, then the cause would be worth it and therefore most likely justified. Let's make it clear that justified means that it is done for a reasonable, worthy cause, but it doesn't mean that it's right, and definitely doesn't mean that people can kill other people as long as they have their own 'reason'. I don't think killing is ethical or righteous whatever the case, but in some it can be justified and accepted.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Chaeli Mycroft
Tem B.
Humanities
Per. 6 and 7 Chaeli Mycroft
Ms. Podorsek
29 Oct. 2012
“I see it as my gift that I can share the message to the world, that disabled people are still people, who have the same needs and the same rights.” In the year 2011, 17 year old Michaeli Mycroft, also known as Chaeli, was chosen as winner of the year’s Children’s International Peace Prize. Chaeli was born with cerebral palsy, meaning the use of her arms and legs are limited, causing her to be bound to the wheelchair for her entire life. When she was 9 years old, she decided that she wanted a motorized wheelchair, therefore she, her sister, and friends started a project to raise money for it, later becoming The Chaeli Campaign. The Chaeli Campaign now focuses on helping children with disabilities under the age of 18. Chaeli is fighting for the rights and hope of disabled children.
Chaeli fights for opportunities for disabled children. This includes therapies, education, counseling, assistive devices, sports, arts, as well as support youth development. Chaeli believes strongly that disabled children should have just the same opportunities as any other to succeed in life, in what they want to do or be. “It is important to me that children with disabilities are given all opportunities in life to succeed and I think that’s the most important focus of the Chaeli Campaign.” Chaeli acknowledges the importance of the abilities of disabled children and that they are no less than any other children. They show how she notices that disabled children can also think of amazing plans and carry them through if they were given the chance. These disabled children aren’t given the opportunity to express what they want or can do, and there for needs help. “...people with disabilities are the minority. The minority is hardly listened to and what makes it more difficult is that a large part of the minority is unable to voice their opinions due to their disabilities.” Because of the lack of attention ordinary people have for the disabled ones, Chaeli finds that she needs to fight for these people so that they’re voices are heard and opportunities are given to them.
Along with opportunities, Chaeli believes that things can’t be entirely possible if there were no hope. Chaeli was able to progress on in her own life and make such a difference for so many people’s lives because of hope. And hope didn’t come all by itself. It was also brought from her family and friends. “Hope is what keeps us going,” Chaeli said in her speech. “It’s what keeps us striving for the lives we deserve. I have hope for myself, but I also have hope for all other children with disabilities.” Chaeli herself believes in other children, and also believes that she too can pass on the hope to them. “I think we need to make a conscious decision to see the light in every person we meet. I think we need to be more positive about each other. If we see the light in each other, I believe we would live in a much brighter world.” She believes that through hope, disabled children will see the light and the way out to a much brighter, positive, and meaningful life.
The Chaeli Campaign continues to help children with disabilities to take a step forward in both their rights to opportunities and hope. To be who they can be, instead of who people say they are. Chaeli’s efforts in improving the phsycological states of disabled children help them to see the light that guides them to the door, leading them to a life worth living. Helps them to see that they deserve a life that’s meaningful, because disabled people are still people.
Sources:
Chaeli International Childrens Peace Prize 2011 - YouTube." 2012. 1 Nov. 2012 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCuEg-WoMlU>
"2011 Chaeli Mycroft - Childrenspeaceprize." 2011. 1 Nov. 2012 <http://childrenspeaceprize.org/childrens-peace-price/2011-chaeli-mycroft/>
"The Chaeli Campaign | Hope in Motion." 2005. 1 Nov. 2012 <http://chaelicampaign.co.za/>
Humanities
Per. 6 and 7 Chaeli Mycroft
Ms. Podorsek
29 Oct. 2012
“I see it as my gift that I can share the message to the world, that disabled people are still people, who have the same needs and the same rights.” In the year 2011, 17 year old Michaeli Mycroft, also known as Chaeli, was chosen as winner of the year’s Children’s International Peace Prize. Chaeli was born with cerebral palsy, meaning the use of her arms and legs are limited, causing her to be bound to the wheelchair for her entire life. When she was 9 years old, she decided that she wanted a motorized wheelchair, therefore she, her sister, and friends started a project to raise money for it, later becoming The Chaeli Campaign. The Chaeli Campaign now focuses on helping children with disabilities under the age of 18. Chaeli is fighting for the rights and hope of disabled children.
Chaeli fights for opportunities for disabled children. This includes therapies, education, counseling, assistive devices, sports, arts, as well as support youth development. Chaeli believes strongly that disabled children should have just the same opportunities as any other to succeed in life, in what they want to do or be. “It is important to me that children with disabilities are given all opportunities in life to succeed and I think that’s the most important focus of the Chaeli Campaign.” Chaeli acknowledges the importance of the abilities of disabled children and that they are no less than any other children. They show how she notices that disabled children can also think of amazing plans and carry them through if they were given the chance. These disabled children aren’t given the opportunity to express what they want or can do, and there for needs help. “...people with disabilities are the minority. The minority is hardly listened to and what makes it more difficult is that a large part of the minority is unable to voice their opinions due to their disabilities.” Because of the lack of attention ordinary people have for the disabled ones, Chaeli finds that she needs to fight for these people so that they’re voices are heard and opportunities are given to them.
Along with opportunities, Chaeli believes that things can’t be entirely possible if there were no hope. Chaeli was able to progress on in her own life and make such a difference for so many people’s lives because of hope. And hope didn’t come all by itself. It was also brought from her family and friends. “Hope is what keeps us going,” Chaeli said in her speech. “It’s what keeps us striving for the lives we deserve. I have hope for myself, but I also have hope for all other children with disabilities.” Chaeli herself believes in other children, and also believes that she too can pass on the hope to them. “I think we need to make a conscious decision to see the light in every person we meet. I think we need to be more positive about each other. If we see the light in each other, I believe we would live in a much brighter world.” She believes that through hope, disabled children will see the light and the way out to a much brighter, positive, and meaningful life.
The Chaeli Campaign continues to help children with disabilities to take a step forward in both their rights to opportunities and hope. To be who they can be, instead of who people say they are. Chaeli’s efforts in improving the phsycological states of disabled children help them to see the light that guides them to the door, leading them to a life worth living. Helps them to see that they deserve a life that’s meaningful, because disabled people are still people.
Sources:
Chaeli International Childrens Peace Prize 2011 - YouTube." 2012. 1 Nov. 2012 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCuEg-WoMlU>
"2011 Chaeli Mycroft - Childrenspeaceprize." 2011. 1 Nov. 2012 <http://childrenspeaceprize.org/childrens-peace-price/2011-chaeli-mycroft/>
"The Chaeli Campaign | Hope in Motion." 2005. 1 Nov. 2012 <http://chaelicampaign.co.za/>
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Identity Poems - What's Worth Fighting For?
One's personal identity is definitely worth fighting for. Each person has something that is them, something that is unique. That one quality is like an ID number or a barcode, differentiating it from the rest. This means that, whether big or small, poor or rich, everyone can make a difference of their own, in their own way. So isn't that worth fighting for?
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Understandings
Consider the following statements:
- A good leader considers the will of the people.
- To maintain control, you must have power.
- Standing up to oppression takes great individual courage.
In view of what we have learned in our unit on the Middle Ages, choose one of the above statements and justify it through examples from our unit and if possible with examples from modern day society.
I chose.... 'To maintain control, you must have power.'
I think this is pretty pretty straight forward. The definition of power is 'the ability to do something or act in a particular way'. To be able to control something means that you have the power to control it. Power doesn't necessarily mean political power, though it is something related. The power that we usually refer to would be the power earned from a certain position, for example, king, president, school principle, etc. For example, King William taking control of England in 1066, or the power that the church had over the people at that time. A modern day example could be a position in our school here, like Mr. Chmelik being the school principle. But that's not the only type of power that exists. According to the definition from the dictionary, it could also be power in the sense that you have the ability to conquer the hearts of a person or many people. Of course, to keep control over a group of people, you need to gain trust and respect from a reasonable amount of people. Controling something can also be as simple as having the power to control yourself. Ironically, it's probably one of the hardest to do!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)